World War 2

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s_iT3DqSXeK3Cv9_7rMJz8JSvINES1kNt_Ca6gFWwK0/edit?usp=sharing

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Assignment 2 Response

I believe that our "Napier's Bones" presentation was quite a treat for some students in class. The gasps of finding out how they did multiplication was very rewarding, because the enjoyment and satisfaction of teaching students something they didn't know really made us happy. I believe that this activity is a fun activity for younger grades, most preferably in elementary school, because it serves as a visual aid to multiplying and dividing numbers. The concept itself isn't very different from how most people learned to multiply, but it shows the type of thinking required for though multiplying "ugly" numbers together. For example, if I were to multiply 37 and 35, it would be easier (for me) to calculate (30 x 35) + (7 x 35) instead. This breakdown of the numbers greatly reduces the stress on a student, and helps them piece together the multiplication instead of having them do difficult mental math.
Read more

Final Project: Alan Turing

My project will be a series of journal articles told through the perspective of a British soldier during the second world war. It will discuss the great works of Alan Turing and how he cut the war short by several years, allowing the soldier to avoid the high potential of death. Strawn G. Alan turing.  IT Professional . 2014;16(1):5-7. Anguera de Sojo A, Ares J, Lara JA, Lizcano D, Martínez MA, Pazos J. Turing and the serendipitous               discovery of the modern computer.  Foundations of Science . 2013;18(3):545-557. Dyson G. The dawn of computing: Alan turing's bridging of logic and machines laid the foundation for               digital computers.  Nature . 2012;482(7386):459. How Alan Turing Cracked The Enigma Code. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2018, from                           https://www.iwm.org.uk/h...
Read more

Was Pythagoras Chinese?

Unless it is a mathematics history course, I do not believe it is necessary to acknowledge any source of mathematics. I personally do not believe that knowing how the Chinese demonstrated a fundamental understanding of a theorem named after Pythagoras will affect how my understanding of said theorem. It is amazing that the Chinese were able to understand various different advanced mathematical concepts, that I will not argue against. However, my life or mathematical abilities have not changed the slightest upon reading about the many advances during the Yellow King's ruling period. If it comes to properly naming something, I do agree that they should be done correctly. Giving credit to where it is due is important, but there are times when a discovery was made by someone who also influenced other fields of academia. Euclid was not only known for Elements , but also for his work on the field of geometry as well. But this only goes back to the my initial argument that it only matters...
Read more